I agree. Here's what I'm getting at, though. Some issues on the tracker are marked as "Critical". I see this to mean "These must be fixed before next release". For instance, I marked the
SCons install target bug as Critical because we can't really make an autopackage until it's fixed. So that's blocking the next release. Others, for instance
this one, seem like they could possibly wait until next release if they aren't done in time, since that one particularly would be a performance enhancement. Perhaps this one should be marked as "High" which I see as meaning "Would be nice to have in the next release but not blocking a release". So if we don't get that one done before release, it can slide. Make sense?