Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Regressions
01-23-2011, 04:02 PM,
#17
 
Quote:What's that mean?
http://www.diclib.com/jack%20something%2...coed/36973

Quote:there is no rolling resistance on the track itself so it's probably something else as well.
With RollResistanceCoefficient = 1.0 you have asphalt rolling resistance. The old code omits the multiplication with tire normal force resulting in a very low rolling resistance. The F1 generates a lot of downforce increasing normal force/rolling resistance with velocity. It still shouldn't top out at 130mph. I guess the quadratic rolling resistance coefficient of the tires is too high, haven't checked the numbers though.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Regressions - by NaN - 01-20-2011, 06:50 AM
[No subject] - by thelusiv - 01-20-2011, 03:06 PM
[No subject] - by fudje - 01-20-2011, 04:29 PM
[No subject] - by portets - 01-20-2011, 09:39 PM
[No subject] - by charlieg - 01-21-2011, 11:58 AM
[No subject] - by NaN - 01-21-2011, 01:57 PM
f1-02 lost power - by alex25 - 01-21-2011, 06:59 PM
[No subject] - by NaN - 01-21-2011, 08:42 PM
[No subject] - by joevenzon_phpbb2_import3 - 01-21-2011, 10:07 PM
[No subject] - by NaN - 01-22-2011, 05:46 AM
[No subject] - by charlieg - 01-22-2011, 07:07 AM
[No subject] - by NaN - 01-22-2011, 11:52 AM
[No subject] - by alex25 - 01-22-2011, 01:40 PM
[No subject] - by charlieg - 01-22-2011, 09:57 PM
[No subject] - by joevenzon_phpbb2_import3 - 01-23-2011, 12:50 PM
[No subject] - by thelusiv - 01-23-2011, 02:07 PM
[No subject] - by NaN - 01-23-2011, 04:02 PM
[No subject] - by charlieg - 01-23-2011, 10:37 PM
[No subject] - by NaN - 01-24-2011, 01:05 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)