Parser rewrite. Need Feedback!

[cologne]

See it as a stupid simple declarative script language. I have actually considered to go towards a Lua or Python compatible syntax to emphasize this.

Oh, i love deep complex hash-structures in Perl!
But the car-file is the interface to ambitious users. A programming language isn´t the best template! The car-file should simply readable and understandable.

Code:

[wheel-0]
orientation = left
...
[wheel-1]
orientation = right
...
[wheel-2]
orientation = left
...
[wheel-3]
orientation = right
...

...very impressive. Will there be a [wheel-4]? Where is wheel-1, front/rear?

Code:

[suspension-0]
coilover = coilover-front

Is "coilover-front" a reference? Why not a datatype „named reference“:

Code:

[suspension-0]
coilover = "coilover-front"

The other way round:
Why [coilover-front] and not [coilover-5]?
Is "coilover-front" a reference or a keyword? There is no different namespace!