Forums
Etch/Feisty Segmentation fault - Printable Version

+- Forums (https://www.vdrift.net/Forum)
+-- Forum: Community (https://www.vdrift.net/Forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Bugs (https://www.vdrift.net/Forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Etch/Feisty Segmentation fault (/showthread.php?tid=566)

Pages: 1 2 3

Etch/Feisty Segmentation fault - Blazeix - 03-24-2007

Hi, I'm running Ubuntu 7.04 Beta, and I just installed the full version of VDrift 2007-03-23. When I try to click 'practice race,' 'single game,' or 'network game' I get a segmentation fault. This apparently also happens under Debian Etch. Here are the last few lines of the verbose output

Code:
widget-07: value source not found, default to manual.
widget-07: button action: CarControls
Loading...
Done
gl_car init
Segmentation fault

Hardware Info:
Dell Precision M70 Laptop
Pentium M
1 Gb RAM
Nvidia Quadro FX Go1400 with 1.0-9631 Driver

- Nigo - 03-24-2007

same here on a Debian Etch (NVidia 9755)

- rookie1 - 03-24-2007

I can confirm this. Just downloaded the minimal package from sourceforge and get the same segfault error. Since the executable does not contain any debug symbol, I can't get a backtrace.

Funny thing is, if I replace the executable with the one I've compiled from svn, there is no error. This is with the same dataset (minimal), same ~/.vdrift config files (created afresh). Seems to me the problem is with the executable file.

I'm running Feisty as well.

- thelusiv - 03-25-2007

rookie1, since you have both access to both the working and broken versions, can you tell me the output of the following command on the one you compiled?
Code:
objdump -x /path/to/vdrift/binary/vdrift | grep NEEDED

I'm imagining that this is due to the OpenGL library having a different filename. It could be issues with the compiler version used to build the package (3.3 and 3.4).

I wish we could have caught these problems with the testing packages before the release. I'll have a new package up to test soon...

- thelusiv - 03-25-2007

Here's an attempt at a fix.

http://clemsonlinux.org/~thelusiv/VDrift-2007-03-23-minimal-2.package

This package was compiled with g++-3.4 and g++-4.1, instead of 3.3 and 3.4. The idea is that hopefully we'll have less users whose systems were built with gcc 3.2/3.3 than those whose systems were built with 4.0/4.1. I'm not sure if this will even fix the problem, but I seem to remember rookie1 reporting that previous packages worked which were compiled with only g++-4.1. If this works for those of you running Etch/Feisty, and doesn't break things for Joe or anyone else, I will replace the packages in the 2007-03-23 release with some that have these fixes.

So please test this package at your earliest convenience and let me know how it goes Smile

Fixed - kyrlian - 03-25-2007

Had the coredump on ubuntu edgy, this fix solved it.
Cheers !

- Nigo - 03-25-2007

the gtk-installer is now telling me I need libc 2.4 while on Etch, the last libc is 2.3.6

- rookie1 - 03-25-2007

I get this when running objdump on the executable compiled from svn,

NEEDED libSDL-1.2.so.0
NEEDED libopenal.so.0
NEEDED libGL.so.1
NEEDED libGLU.so.1
NEEDED libSDL_image-1.2.so.0
NEEDED libSDL_net-1.2.so.0
NEEDED libSDL_gfx.so.4
NEEDED libalut.so.0
NEEDED libstdc++.so.6
NEEDED libm.so.6
NEEDED libgcc_s.so.1
NEEDED libc.so.6

For comparison, following is the result of objdump on the release binary,

NEEDED libSDL-1.2.so.0
NEEDED libpthread.so.0
NEEDED libGL.so.1
NEEDED libGLU.so.1
NEEDED libSDL_image-1.2.so.0
NEEDED libSDL_net-1.2.so.0
NEEDED libstdc++.so.5
NEEDED libm.so.6
NEEDED libc.so.6
NEEDED libdl.so.2


I'll download the new package and try it again.

- thelusiv - 03-25-2007

Nigo I'm not sure why that is, I haven't changed any of the library checks. I believe the C library check is automatically added by autopackage. I'll see what I can do about that...

rookie1, thanks for that output, I guess it's not just a matter of different filenames.

- Nigo - 03-25-2007

it's saying exactly "your copy of 'glibc' is too old for this packet. You need at least the following symbols in 'glibc' : GLIBC_2.4"

while the old packet was installing flawlessly

- rookie1 - 03-25-2007

ok the new package works now. Out of curiosity, I did a objdump on the new binary as well,

NEEDED libSDL-1.2.so.0
NEEDED libpthread.so.0
NEEDED libGL.so.1
NEEDED libGLU.so.1
NEEDED libSDL_image-1.2.so.0
NEEDED libSDL_net-1.2.so.0
NEEDED libstdc++.so.6
NEEDED libm.so.6
NEEDED libc.so.6
NEEDED libdl.so.2


The only difference from the last release binary is libstdc++.so.6.

- thelusiv - 03-25-2007

rookie1, that's good news from the Feisty end of things. Nigo, can you tell me what your default compiler is on Etch? Is it gcc-3.4? For instance on my Ubuntu Edgy machine:
Code:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/gcc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2007-01-02 10:58 /usr/bin/gcc -> gcc-4.1


- Nigo - 03-25-2007

I do have libstdc++6

Quote:$ ls -l /usr/bin/gcc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2007-04-09 23:02 /usr/bin/gcc -> gcc-4.1


- thelusiv - 03-25-2007

Nigo & rookie1, please test the package at the same location again, http://clemsonlinux.org/~thelusiv/VDrift-2007-03-23-minimal-2.package

I have updated it. This one is back to 3.3/3.4. Let me know how it works for you.

- Nigo - 03-25-2007

it does install but I still got the seg fault :cry: