![]() |
|
F1 Modification - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.vdrift.net/Forum) +-- Forum: Community (https://www.vdrift.net/Forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Cars & Tracks (https://www.vdrift.net/Forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Thread: F1 Modification (/showthread.php?tid=548) Pages:
1
2
|
- cologne - 05-26-2007 According to the rules updated all cars to a total weight of 610 kg Quote:ARTICLE 4: WEIGHThttp://www.formula1.com/insight/rulesandregs/21/5276.html The version of the new mass is Version 2.1 and higher F1-Car for fast tracks - cologne - 05-26-2007 Here my actual definiton for fast tracks as Monza and Le Mans. Nearly 380 km/h. Drive and brake carefully at lower speed. Oversteer characteristic. --------- Updated to Vers. 2.1.0 20070526 --------- drive = RWD # F1-F fast version for Monza, Le Mans, Spa (?), ... # Version 20070526 # Version 2.1.0 from cologne 20070526 [ steering ] max-angle = 36.39 [ engine ] position = 1.82, 0.0, -0.44 mass = 95.0 max-power = 633844 peak-engine-rpm = 19000.0 rpm-limit = 19500.0 inertia = 0.4 idle = 0.08 fuel-consumption = 6e-9 torque-friction = 0.0001 start-rpm = 4000 stall-rpm = 2500 torque-curve-00 = 2500, 90.00 torque-curve-01 = 3000, 110.59 torque-curve-02 = 3600, 135.59 torque-curve-03 = 3750, 160.21 torque-curve-04 = 4000, 190.47 torque-curve-05 = 4250, 202.15 torque-curve-06 = 4500, 211.56 torque-curve-07 = 5000, 218.78 torque-curve-08 = 5500, 225.23 torque-curve-09 = 6000, 237.37 torque-curve-10 = 6500, 238.89 torque-curve-11 = 7000, 242.69 torque-curve-12 = 7500, 243.43 torque-curve-13 = 8000, 244.91 torque-curve-14 = 8500, 246.27 torque-curve-15 = 9000, 248.95 torque-curve-16 = 9600, 250.20 torque-curve-17 = 10000, 259.65 torque-curve-18 = 10500, 269.78 torque-curve-19 = 11000, 295.51 torque-curve-20 = 12000, 320.00 torque-curve-21 = 13000, 330.00 torque-curve-22 = 14000, 347.00 torque-curve-23 = 15000, 330.00 torque-curve-24 = 16000, 320.00 torque-curve-25 = 17000, 310.00 torque-curve-26 = 18000, 300.00 torque-curve-27 = 19000, 290.00 torque-curve-28 = 20000, 280.00 [ clutch ] #sliding = 0.27 sliding = 0.10 radius = 0.15 area = 0.75 #max-pressure = 35000.00 max-pressure = 60000.00 [ transmission ] gears = 7 gear-ratio-r = -4.5 gear-ratio-1 = 4.30 gear-ratio-2 = 3.60 gear-ratio-3 = 3.00 gear-ratio-4 = 2.60 gear-ratio-5 = 2.30 gear-ratio-6 = 2.05 gear-ratio-7 = 1.85 # max ca 3xx km/h (final-drive = 3.45) shift-delay = 0.01 [ differential ] final-drive = 3.45 anti-slip = 430.0 [ fuel-tank ] position = -0.26, -0.17, -0.56 capacity = 180 volume = 100 fuel-density = 0.8 [ suspension-front ] #spring-constant = 90000 spring-constant = 120000 ## Druckstufe #bounce = 11050 bounce = 8000 ## Zugstufe #rebound = 10700 rebound = 12000 # Federweg travel = 0.06 max-compression-velocity = 10.0 ## Radsturz camber = -1.00 #camber = -1.33 ## Nachlauf caster = 0.08 ## Vorspur? toe = 0.9 ## Stabilisator #anti-roll = 10000 anti-roll = 8000 [ suspension-rear ] #spring-constant = 170000 spring-constant = 160000 ## Druckstufe #bounce = 10000 bounce = 9000 ## Zugstufe #rebound = 11000 rebound = 14000 # Federweg travel = 0.08 max-compression-velocity = 10.0 ## Radsturz #camber = -0.45 camber = -0.35 ## Nachlauf caster = 0.28 ## Vorspur? toe = 0.0 ## Stabilisator #anti-roll = 15000 anti-roll = 12000 [ tire-front ] radius = 0.325 rolling-resistance = 1.3e-2, 6.5e-6 #rotational-inertia = 5.0 rotational-inertia = 2.0 tread = 0.0 # Lateral force # Shape factor A0 a0=1.39 # Load infl. on lat. friction coeff (*1000) (1/kN) A1 a1=-90 # Lateral friction coefficient at load = 0 (*1000) A2 a2=1900 # Maximum stiffness (N/deg) A3 a3=2900 # Load at maximum stiffness (kN) A4 a4=7.2 # Camber infiuence on stiffness (%/deg/100) . A5 a5=0.024 # Curvature change with load A6 a6=-0.24 # Curvature at load = 0 A7 a7=1.0 # Horizontal shift because of camber (deg/deg) A8 a8=-0.03 # Load influence on horizontal shift (deg/kN) A9 a9=-0.0013 # Horizontal shift at load = 0 (deg) A10 a10=-0.15 # Camber influence on vertical shift (N/deg/kN) A111 a111=-8.5 # Camber influence on vertical shift (N/deg/kN**2) A112 a112=-0.29 # Load influence on vertical shift (N/kN) A12 a12=17.8 # Vertical shift at load = 0 (N) A13 a13=-2.4 # Longitudinal force # Shape factor B0 b0=1.95 # Load infl. on long. friction coeff (*1000) (1/kN) B1 b1=-85 # Longitudinal friction coefficient at load = 0 (*1000) B2 b2=1950 # Curvature factor of stiffness (N/%/kN**2) . B3 b3=24.3 # Change of stiffness with load at load = 0 (N/%/kN) B4 b4=390 # Change of progressivity of stiffness/load (1/kN) B5 b5=0.07 # Curvature change with load B6 b6=0 # Curvature change with load B7 b7=0.059 # Curvature at load = 0 B8 b8=-0.024 # Load influence on horizontal shift (%/kN) B9 b9=0.014 # Horizontal shift at load = 0 (%) B10 b10=0.26 # Load influence on vertical shift (N/kN) B11 b11=0.0 # Vertical shift at load = 0 (N) B12 b12=0.0 # Aligning moment # Shape factor C0 # Load influence of peak value (Nm/kN**2) C1 c1=-4.1 # Load influence of peak value (Nm/kN) C2 c2=-4.2 # Curvature factor of stiffness (Nm/deg/kN**2) C3 c3=-1.8 # Change of stiffness with load at load = 0 (Nm/deg/kN) C4 c4=-9.1 # Change of progressivity of stiffness/load (1/kN) C5 c5=0.0225 # Camber influence on stiffness (%/deg/100) C6 c6=0 # Curvature change with load C7 c7=0.044 # Curvature change with load C8 c8=-0.58 # Curvature at load = 0 C9 c9=0.18 # Camber influence of stiffness C10 c10=0.043 # Camber influence on horizontal shift (deg/deg) C11 c11=0.048 # Load influence on horizontal shift (deg/kN) C12 c12=-0.0035 # Horizontal shift at load = 0 (deg) C13 c13=-0.18 # Camber influence on vertical shift (Nm/deg/kN**2) C14 c14=0.14 # Camber influence on vertical shift (Nm/deg/kN) C15 c15=-1.029 # Load influence on vertical shift (Nm/kN) C16 c16=0.27 # Vertical shift at load = 0 (Nm) C17c0=2.2 c17=-1.1 [ tire-rear ] radius = 0.340 rolling-resistance = 1.3e-2, 6.5e-6 #rotational-inertia = 5.50 rotational-inertia = 2.50 tread = 0.0 # Lateral force # Shape factor A0 a0=1.55 # Load infl. on lat. friction coeff (*1000) (1/kN) A1 a1=-50 # Lateral friction coefficient at load = 0 (*1000) A2 a2=1750 # Maximum stiffness (N/deg) A3 a3=2800 # Load at maximum stiffness (kN) A4 a4=7.0 # Camber infiuence on stiffness (%/deg/100) . A5 a5=0.024 # Curvature change with load A6 a6=-0.24 # Curvature at load = 0 A7 a7=1.0 # Horizontal shift because of camber (deg/deg) A8 a8=-0.03 # Load influence on horizontal shift (deg/kN) A9 a9=-0.0013 # Horizontal shift at load = 0 (deg) A10 a10=-0.15 # Camber influence on vertical shift (N/deg/kN) A111 a111=-8.5 # Camber influence on vertical shift (N/deg/kN**2) A112 a112=-0.29 # Load influence on vertical shift (N/kN) A12 a12=17.8 # Vertical shift at load = 0 (N) A13 a13=-2.4 # Longitudinal force # Shape factor B0 b0=1.75 # Load infl. on long. friction coeff (*1000) (1/kN) B1 b1=-100 # Longitudinal friction coefficient at load = 0 (*1000) B2 b2=2200 # Curvature factor of stiffness (N/%/kN**2) . B3 b3=23.3 # Change of stiffness with load at load = 0 (N/%/kN) B4 b4=410 # Change of progressivity of stiffness/load (1/kN) B5 b5=0.075 # Curvature change with load B6 b6=0 # Curvature change with load B7 b7=0.055 # Curvature at load = 0 B8 b8=-0.024 # Load influence on horizontal shift (%/kN) B9 b9=0.014 # Horizontal shift at load = 0 (%) B10 b10=0.26 # Load influence on vertical shift (N/kN) B11 b11=0.0 # Vertical shift at load = 0 (N) B12 b12=0.0 # Aligning moment # Shape factor C0 # Load influence of peak value (Nm/kN**2) C1 c1=-4.3 # Load influence of peak value (Nm/kN) C2 c2=-4.4 # Curvature factor of stiffness (Nm/deg/kN**2) C3 c3=-1.9 # Change of stiffness with load at load = 0 (Nm/deg/kN) C4 c4=-9.6 # Change of progressivity of stiffness/load (1/kN) C5 c5=0.0225 # Camber influence on stiffness (%/deg/100) C6 c6=0 # Curvature change with load C7 c7=0.044 # Curvature change with load C8 c8=-0.58 # Curvature at load = 0 C9 c9=0.18 # Camber influence of stiffness C10 c10=0.043 # Camber influence on horizontal shift (deg/deg) C11 c11=0.048 # Load influence on horizontal shift (deg/kN) C12 c12=-0.0035 # Horizontal shift at load = 0 (deg) C13 c13=-0.18 # Camber influence on vertical shift (Nm/deg/kN**2) C14 c14=0.14 # Camber influence on vertical shift (Nm/deg/kN) C15 c15=-1.029 # Load influence on vertical shift (Nm/kN) C16 c16=0.27 # Vertical shift at load = 0 (Nm) C17c0=2.2 c17=-1.1 [ brakes-front ] friction = 1.40 max-pressure = 2.5e6 bias = 0.56 radius = 0.17 area = 0.015 [ brakes-rear ] friction = 1.40 max-pressure = 2.5e6 #bias = 0.44 bias = 0.60 radius = 0.14 area = 0.015 handbrake = 1.0 [ driver ] #position = -0.00, 0.00, 0.00 position = -0.14, 0.00, 0.00 mass = 80.0 view-position = -0.10, 0.00, 0.15 #hood-mounted-view-position = -0.8, 0.0, 0.8 hood-mounted-view-position = -0.10, 0.00, 0.15 # length, width, height X, Y, Z [ drag ] position = 0.0, 0.0, 0.2 frontal-area = 1.3 drag-coefficient = 0.43 [ wing-front ] position = 1.9, 0.0, 0.60 frontal-area = 0.05 drag-coefficient = 0.00 surface-area = 0.9 lift-coefficient = -3.30 efficiency = 0.99 [ wing-rear ] position = -2.14, 0.0, 0.37 frontal-area = 0.15 drag-coefficient = 0.10 surface-area = 1.00 lift-coefficient = -3.50 efficiency = 0.99 [ wheel-FR ] position = 2.22, -0.73, -0.53 roll-height = 0.325 mass = 14 restitution = 0.1 [ suspension-FR ] position = 2.22, -0.75, -0.57 hinge = 0,0,0 [ wheel-FL ] position = 2.22, 0.73, -0.53 roll-height = 0.325 mass = 14 restitution = 0.1 [ suspension-FL ] position = 2.22, 0.75, -0.57 hinge = 0,0,0 [ wheel-RR ] position = -2.02, -0.71, -0.52 roll-height = 0.340 mass = 17 restitution = 0.1 [ suspension-RR ] position = -2.02, -0.75, -0.07 hinge = -1.0,0,0 [ wheel-RL ] position = -2.02, 0.71, -0.52 roll-height = 0.340 mass = 17 restitution = 0.1 [ suspension-RL ] position = -2.02, 0.75, -0.07 hinge = -1.0,0,0 [ contact-points ] # used to find the bounds of the car (for collisions) # also play into the weight distribution and balance mass = 0.05 position-00 = 2.35, 0.0, -0.6 position-01 = 2.31, 0.48, -0.6 position-02 = 2.31, -0.48, -0.6 position-03 = 2.14, 0.86, -0.6 position-04 = 2.14, -0.86, -0.6 position-05 = 2.0, 0.96, -0.6 position-06 = 2.0, -0.96, -0.6 position-07 = 0.52, 0.97, 0.22 position-08 = 0.52, -0.97, 0.22 position-09 = -1.87, 0.95, -0.6 position-10 = -1.87, -0.95, -0.6 position-11 = -2.29, 0.43, -0.53 position-12 = -2.29, -0.43, -0.53 position-13 = -2.36, 0.30, -0.20 position-14 = -2.36, -0.30, -0.20 position-15 = -2.3, 0.84, 0.56 position-16 = -2.3, -0.84, 0.56 # these are used to calculate the weight distribution and balance [ particle-00 ] mass = 15.0 position = -1.35, 0.0, -0.47 [ particle-01 ] mass = 20.0 position = 0.96, 0.0, -0.47 [ particle-02 ] mass = 95.0 position = -1.3, 0.5, 0.09 [ particle-03 ] mass = 95.0 position = -1.3, -0.5, 0.09 [ particle-04 ] mass = 75.0 position = 1.6, 0.45, -0.13 [ particle-05 ] mass = 75.0 position = 1.6, -0.45, -0.13 - cotharyus - 05-26-2007 Yes, the tire model is very complex. I haven't been around much, I have been very, disgustingly, busy at work for at least the last 3 months. Maybe it's been longer, I don't remember. Anyhow, yes, the tire model is imperfect. I have not tried these new cars out, but I know we do not have enough sidewall flex, and the last F1 car I tried, the model had too much suspension travel. It's something to think about. Hopefully soon I will be able to work some on the tires some more. best laptime in Monaco - foyol - 05-26-2007 well, my best time with your setup is 1:23:736, but without the chicane after the tunnel (i go straight ahead). i think that respecting the chicane i can go around 1:30 (I'm surely not Senna, anyway). Since the car don't report damages in VDrift, i can't tell if my lap is perfectly clean, so take my best time merely as an indication of what i would like to do if i could ![]() going to look at the map, thanks again
- cologne - 05-26-2007 Quote:the last F1 car I tried, the model had too much suspension travel. I corrected this. Please try out one of my modifications! They are much better than the release F1 definition. New personal record on Nuerburgring: 5:52 with the mid-fast 2.1.0 New personal record in Monaco: 1:26 with the slow 2.1.0 On Mosport: 1:02 with the fast 2.1.0 Learning to use cologne updated setup - foyol - 05-29-2007 My new best laps (with and without respecting the chicane after the tunnel) with the cologne slow2.1.0 setup 1:22:892 1:18:220 May be one day cologne will sound like Abarth! - cologne - 05-29-2007 I found: Quote:26. Mai 2002 Monte Carlo I guess that i loose a little time using a gamepad. In some curves i use a higher gear, its easier to control. I (try to) drive through the cicane, braking in 6th gear to 2nd. I analysed weight and weight-distribution. Oh, the engine is placed between the knees of the driver!!! I changed the distribution to nearly 43% / 57% and had massive problems with a very "dynamic" rear. Lowering the suspension values the car drives nearly as before and he has more "mecanical grip". The suspension seems too hard in my actual 2.1.0 release!! Next days comes a new slow version: Please post your impressions! scaled down F1 ! - cologne - 12-23-2007 After some month doing other things in my free time - two free falls with bycicle and airfoil, programming my CMS-Framework and researches in local history - and buying a book about blender i made a new attempt to scale the F1. This time i haven´t any problem (before i didn´t "apply" transformations...). Also the real F1 wheels are exported. There are two new pictures in my gallery for comparison! The smaller F1 behaves much more nervous (masses are more concentrated) and needs some fine tuning. I will publish the whole package in some days... - joevenzon - 12-24-2007 Here are the links: before: http://vdrift.net/Gallery/media.php?f=0&sort=0&s=2007122305123860 after: http://vdrift.net/Gallery/media.php?f=0&sort=0&s=20071223051240819 Looks good. |